Implantation Bleeding Pieces Tissue

solid waste incinerators or incinerators?

How to get rid of our problems ... Burning.

In Italy they considered renewable energy and subsidize them as such.
Their safety for health it 's never been proven, but only very probabilistically "supposed".

addition to paying taxes on junk subsidize these plants in Italy through a retained on the electricity bill of around 7% which is called CIP6.

This stems from a decision of the Interministerial Committee on Prices born of a noble idea in 1992 where you have to deduct from the bill a burden to be devoted to renewable sources "and is instead transformed into a means in practice that was used for the vast majority to finance incinerators and similar plants.

The words "Renewable Sources" where it adds, "and Assimilate" and in this last group, including incinerators, (to justify the fact that they are then called "thermo promoting the exploitation )

One example is the CIP 6 / 92:
" With this measure the following provisions shall come into force on energy produced by plants ... powered by renewable and assimilated "

Moreover CIP also are encouraged with specific plants coal to fuel oils and refineries (provided that they meet certain proportions of fuel and thermal energy. View Energy Index to Title I of the resolution CIP)
sad thing is' that the vast majority of Italians do not know that these facilities are not even "disappear" completely waste, but, in addition to rope discharge, solid waste produce approximately equal to 12% by volume and 15-20% by weight of waste introduced, and in addition to the ash 5%. Discard obviously we bury .
http://www.energialab.it/Downloads/Schede/rifiuti.pdf

addition, the effect of these provisions the state pays producers three times the energy that respects the CIP and act on equal 'investment, these facilities make it much more' than a wind farm or worse a calendar, so a manufacturer must sell that energy will invest capital there (and it did).
addition, even worse, the ruling gives him the right to certify that energy as "green " and then sold again to obtain a certificate on the European market special (a mechanism of "green certificates ").
http://www.grtn.it/ita/fontirinnovabili/certificativerdi.asp

A risk past (intentionally) overlooked

Everything 'and' sold to the Italians as "renewable energy "(but in fact it is not '). And more 'finance. It took two subliminal words and the game and 'it!

• Assimilate : This term is outside the term "renewable". What we burn is nothing but a refusal which by definition are not able to renew !
• Incinerators : Valuing our refusal. Yes How? burning. So why do not you call them directly incinerators?

Italy with these pseudo-measures slowly slips back into a Europe that is proudly forward in combating pollution.
Besides, who pays the consequences are its citizens and their health. Many studies
denounce it, because of dioxin and heavy metals in incineration ground, serious damage to health of those around him to an incinerator and the products of adjacent crops (for which those who then eat them).
And although these studies may be questionable, Why take the risk that they are not?

• http://www.ehjournal.net/content/6/1/19

• http://www.alessandroronchi.net/files/relazione_enhance_health.pdf

• http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&uid=15922405&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google

These are using some cunning political / industrial / petroleum Italian guided solely by economic interests. They are used regulations difficult to follow for people and still come in handy, so, those who understand silent. They all want, in fact, get rid of the waste and if something is not seen, no one complains. You then advertise
scientists who claim that incinerators do not create damage to health and that's it:
Dr. Veronesi: http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=EsqHRaeZaHs

whose foundation as a partner
- ACEA - multi-utility with incinerators
- ENEL - and heavy oils, coal and nuclear
- Veolia Environment - building incinerators

Today we know that many strive to show harm risk:

• The Greens presented a bill to abolish the green certificates incinerators: http://www.alessandroronchi.net/2006/09/15 / project-in-law-to-abolish-the-certified-green-to-incinerators /

• The European Commission under President Romano Prodi in 2003 with the EU Commissioner for Transport and 'Energy, Loyola De Palacio, in response to a question of' MEP Monica Frassoni, on 11/20/2003 (response E-2935/03IT) reiterated the EU still no extension of the system European subsidies for the development of renewable energy sources, provided for by Directive 2001/77, the incineration of the non-biodegradable waste.

• On online petition is that anyone can sign a petition to abolish funding for incinerators and similar sources: http://www.petitiononline.com/RESETINC/

• The Conseil National de l'Ordre des Médecins and the main French trade unions of French general practitioners' praticiens "called for" a moratorium on the construction of new incinerators. " Incineration produces hundreds of toxic substances that are released into the atmosphere: http://www.sante.gouv.fr/htm/actu/secu-sanit_03/fiche14.pdf

If we find that the immediate solution to manage other the problem is not waste if you do not incinerate, we must also say in a loud voice that this solution is temporary 'cause the problem to be fought and' another, and that is that refusal should not be produced origin.