Sunday, November 30, 2008

How To Cut A Snowmobile Windshield

worms

Facts:
What facts? I do not want to confuse the ideas so if you get / a purposes to the facts here, by following the links that I have brought them know and you decide how your interest and adjusted according to your conscience! If you're here by accident or chissacome read the previous articles you see in the index that is at the top right. Rather, we leave room investigating this dirty story of your "private eye, cyberdetective" Poison Romano handrails and strong 'cause here things begin to come out good as they say in Italian "are cocks to shit!

... V report to the client
A llora now the "assassins" are two or more applicants, but both profess innocence and since people are worth (as Mark Antony said in Julius Caesar, Shakespeare), we believe. The potential victim is them 'and relies on its defense to the "experts" do not know whether by faith or mental laziness. The murder weapon yet, but someone must take the form of 'already' hit among bloggers. A "martyr" who is widely cited, his name is Carlo Ruta. Who is' he? Perhaps the distant cousin of Carneades? Fear not the client, you are NOT paying for your private eye poison for that!
First, read this riassuntino understanding that everything that follows should be linked to your critical mind, to your beliefs and where you are on the payroll.

Who 'Carlo Ruta?
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Ruta

Now if you have the stomach for it read the reasons for the sentence that has been for Charles' underground press' so 'as reported in full Daniele Minotti, the lawyer who rescues an entire category by itself.
http://www.minotti.net/2008/08/31/carlo-ruta-i-motivi-della-sentenza/

The signature of the judge and 'that Dr Patricia Di Marco, and if look on Google you find traces of little or nothing, perhaps because it 's wise person who knows how to keep a low profile or perhaps because' Dante would have rammed mercilessly 'between the sloth!
What the fuck has done so 'this terrible Carlo Ruta? There is nothing extraordinary in the Italian "mysteries" where a shit fly becomes a state secret if it touches those who are or think they are "so willed 'cola' where is power to do 'you want ...
He made a name Agostino Fera, the judge who denounced it as her right as she felt violated. Absolutely in his right. Too bad, 'if he had his cocks and he pretended not to have done better and would not have intrigued many "evil tongue."
So we try a little bit about this name to remember, Agostino Fera, but Agostino ooooh you realize that with a name so 'you could go completely unnoticed? And you instead of you? Make a martyr! But who would ever fucked in Italy in the scandals? And you do break a casino instead! If I were your father or at least your godfather ... Confirmation of wish you would pull the ears up to seeing red, red, red. So let's see what they say around dr. Agostino Fera, understanding that may be dirty slander.

http://www.google.it/search?hl=it&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:it:official&hs=rxF&q=Agostino+Fera&start=10 & ; sa = N
http://www.girodivite.it/32-anni-dal-delitto-Spampinato.html
http://www.giustiziaesfatta.com/Fera 20Agostino%%% 20ed 20th 20capi%%% 20clan 20Dominante-Carbonaro.html
http://es.camera.it/_dati/leg14 / lavori/stenografici/btestiatti/4-17118.htm
http://alessandrobottoni.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/caccia-ai-blogger/
hhttp: / / art. noblogs.org/post/2008/08/16/il-caso-spampinato-spettacolo-patrocinato ...
http://www.cuntrastamu.org/wordpress/?p=419

Ah ah ah, what a mess my friends here but there 's a nice worms!



The Carlo Ruta he gets a sentence with the signature "gray" by Patricia Di Marco scrambling between you and decides to make no reference to article 1, paragraph 3, L. No 62/2001.
http://www.camera.it/parlam/leggi/01062l.htm
adding that:
[snip]
"In this regard it should be pointed out that the first" blog "is mainly a communication tool where anyone can write what they want and as such can also be used to publish a newspaper. "
[snip]
Review the decision published by D. Minotti
http://www.minotti.net/2008/08/31/carlo-ruta-i-motivi-della-sentenza/

Except that the use of this law is then criticized the use made by the "magistrate" of the speakers from the same:

http://banchedati.camera.it/sindacatoispettivo_16/showXhtml.Asp?idAtto=1183&stile=6&highLight=1&paroleContenute =
http://www.giornalismi.info/vocilibere/articoli/art_1101.html
http://www.peacelink.it/mediawatch/a/26545.html
http://solleviamoci.wordpress.com/2008/10/03/liberta-di-bloggare-legge-sulleditoria-ed-on-giulietti/

Shit, shit, shit! I want the gun that I forgot in Second Life, not to kill but to defend myself. I have to light a "nervous" cigarette and support me with a shot of vodka. Here is' a dangerous track, better cancer and liver cirrhosis. Who is' the principal? There 's some "hard power" behind the bill? The bloggers' a witness too inconvenient? Can 'the avatar of a suicide cyberdetective found to be "hanging" with his feet resting on the ground or an overdose of "Sicilian caponata?

(continued)

0 comments:

Post a Comment